Meostar 2.5-12x56 or Swarovski Z3 3-10x42 : Which would be better low light...
Author: 153Subject: 38973Posted: December/06/2013 at 10:43Which would be better low light scope for hunting? I have older Swaro 3-12x50 and it is clear and heck of a low light scope but I want another...
View ArticleMeostar 2.5-12x56 or Swarovski Z3 3-10x42 : The Z3 you mentioned is one of...
Author: bugsNbowsSubject: 38973Posted: December/06/2013 at 11:45The Z3 you mentioned is one of my all-time favorites. I have had zero low light concerns using it. You may also consider a 2.5-10 X 56...
View ArticleMeostar 2.5-12x56 or Swarovski Z3 3-10x42 : u mean the 3-12x56 meostar? i...
Author: Robster80Subject: 38973Posted: December/07/2013 at 13:19u mean the 3-12x56 meostar? i hav one with illum reticle. love it. big view and very clear
View ArticleMeostar 2.5-12x56 or Swarovski Z3 3-10x42 : I have several Z3's and...
Author: easSubject: 38973Posted: December/07/2013 at 15:34I have several Z3's and couldn't be happier with them (including low light). I have only one MeoStar but it isn't the 56mm. I am very happy...
View ArticleMeostar 2.5-12x56 or Swarovski Z3 3-10x42 : A 56mm bell should out dual a...
Author: mike650Subject: 38973Posted: December/07/2013 at 15:48A 56mm bell should out dual a 42mm for gathering light in low light situations. If you want it strictly for low light hunting get the 56mm,...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Meostar 2.5-12x56 or Swarovski Z3 3-10x42 : Robster80 wrote:u mean the...
Author: bugsNbowsSubject: 38973Posted: December/08/2013 at 09:20 Robster80 wrote:u mean the 3-12x56 meostar? i hav one with illum reticle. love it. big view and very clearNope, Trijicon Accupoint. No...
View ArticleMeostar 2.5-12x56 or Swarovski Z3 3-10x42 : are illuminated reticles really...
Author: joshmb1999Subject: 38973Posted: December/18/2014 at 22:50are illuminated reticles really an advantage or should you just invest in the better glass? is the swaro glass waaaay better than the...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Meostar 2.5-12x56 or Swarovski Z3 3-10x42 : joshmb1999 wrote:are illuminated...
Author: Maverick2Subject: 38973Posted: December/19/2014 at 01:16 joshmb1999 wrote:are illuminated reticles really an advantage or should you just invest in the better glass? is the swaro glass waaaay...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Meostar 2.5-12x56 or Swarovski Z3 3-10x42 : this is a pretty awesome...
Author: joshmb1999Subject: 38973Posted: December/19/2014 at 20:01this is a pretty awesome conversation for me. Thank you to everyone who has chimed in!I'm definitely leaning away from the...
View ArticleMeostar 2.5-12x56 or Swarovski Z3 3-10x42 : I have a Leica ER 3.5-14x42 and...
Author: easSubject: 38973Posted: December/19/2014 at 20:27I have a Leica ER 3.5-14x42 and several Z3's so I can say you will be very happy with the glass on either of them. I still prefer the view in...
View ArticleMeostar 2.5-12x56 or Swarovski Z3 3-10x42 : Which would be better low light...
Author: 153Subject: 38973Posted: December/06/2013 at 10:43Which would be better low light scope for hunting? I have older Swaro 3-12x50 and it is clear and heck of a low light scope but I want another...
View ArticleMeostar 2.5-12x56 or Swarovski Z3 3-10x42 : The Z3 you mentioned is one of...
Author: bugsNbowsSubject: 38973Posted: December/06/2013 at 11:45The Z3 you mentioned is one of my all-time favorites. I have had zero low light concerns using it. You may also consider a 2.5-10 X 56...
View ArticleMeostar 2.5-12x56 or Swarovski Z3 3-10x42 : u mean the 3-12x56 meostar? i...
Author: Robster80Subject: 38973Posted: December/07/2013 at 13:19u mean the 3-12x56 meostar? i hav one with illum reticle. love it. big view and very clear
View ArticleMeostar 2.5-12x56 or Swarovski Z3 3-10x42 : I have several Z3's and...
Author: easSubject: 38973Posted: December/07/2013 at 15:34I have several Z3's and couldn't be happier with them (including low light). I have only one MeoStar but it isn't the 56mm. I am very happy...
View ArticleMeostar 2.5-12x56 or Swarovski Z3 3-10x42 : A 56mm bell should out dual a...
Author: mike650Subject: 38973Posted: December/07/2013 at 15:48A 56mm bell should out dual a 42mm for gathering light in low light situations. If you want it strictly for low light hunting get the 56mm,...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Meostar 2.5-12x56 or Swarovski Z3 3-10x42 : Robster80 wrote:u mean the...
Author: bugsNbowsSubject: 38973Posted: December/08/2013 at 09:20 Robster80 wrote:u mean the 3-12x56 meostar? i hav one with illum reticle. love it. big view and very clearNope, Trijicon Accupoint. No...
View ArticleMeostar 2.5-12x56 or Swarovski Z3 3-10x42 : are illuminated reticles really...
Author: joshmb1999Subject: 38973Posted: December/18/2014 at 22:50are illuminated reticles really an advantage or should you just invest in the better glass? is the swaro glass waaaay better than the...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Meostar 2.5-12x56 or Swarovski Z3 3-10x42 : joshmb1999 wrote:are illuminated...
Author: Maverick2Subject: 38973Posted: December/19/2014 at 01:16 joshmb1999 wrote:are illuminated reticles really an advantage or should you just invest in the better glass? is the swaro glass waaaay...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Meostar 2.5-12x56 or Swarovski Z3 3-10x42 : this is a pretty awesome...
Author: joshmb1999Subject: 38973Posted: December/19/2014 at 20:01this is a pretty awesome conversation for me. Thank you to everyone who has chimed in!I'm definitely leaning away from the...
View ArticleMeostar 2.5-12x56 or Swarovski Z3 3-10x42 : I have a Leica ER 3.5-14x42 and...
Author: easSubject: 38973Posted: December/19/2014 at 20:27I have a Leica ER 3.5-14x42 and several Z3's so I can say you will be very happy with the glass on either of them. I still prefer the view in...
View Article